UPDATE I, 11:30AM:
Shortly after posting the above item at 10AM, I sent an e-mail with a link to my item to Enquirer editor Carl Weiser (who runs the Politics Extra blog) and reporter Paul Kostyu (who wrote the Santorum item and took the photo of the protester with the sign:
Date: Tue, 06 Mar 2012 10:20:05 -0500
From: "Peter M. Heimlich" <firstname.lastname@example.org>
To: email@example.com, firstname.lastname@example.org
Subject: The Sidebar: Cincinnati Enquirer blog runs photo of protester's sign of Dan Savage's "santorum" neologism
http://www.the-sidebar.com/2012/03/cincinnati-enquirer-politics-blog-runs.htmlSince then, per the screen shot below, the photo's been deleted with no notification to readers that the story's been modified or updated:
UPDATE III, 3:40PM:Date: Tue, 06 Mar 2012 11:55:32 -0500 From: "Peter M. Heimlich" <email@example.com> To: firstname.lastname@example.org CC: email@example.com, firstname.lastname@example.org Subject: media inquiry Carl Weiser Assistant editor Government/public affairs Dear Mr. Weiser, I'd doing an update to this blog item I reported this morning. I'd appreciate your answer to a quick question: http://www.the-sidebar.com/2012/03/cincinnati-enquirer-politics-blog-runs.html Per the 11:30AM update on my item, there's no indication on Mr. Kostyu's item that it's been altered or what constitutes the nature of the alternation. Does this conform to the Enquirer's corrections policy? Thanks for your attention and I look forward to your reply. Sincerely, Peter M. Heimlich Atlanta ph: (208)474-7283 website: Medfraud blog: The Sidebar cc: Carolyn Washburn, Editor and Vice President of News Craig Silverman, Editor of Regret the Error, Poynter Adjunct Faculty
The Political Daily Download blog caught another edit that I missed. When the Enquirer revised it's story, a photo was substituted:
|That was then...|
|...and this is now.|
I'm still waiting to hear from the Enquirer's Carl Weiser as to whether the alterations were in compliance with the paper's corrections policy.
4:15PM From Gannett Newspaper Division issues guidelines on ethical news-gathering conduct for newsrooms:
Errors should be corrected with sufficient prominence that readers who saw the original error are likely to see the correction. This is a matter of the editor's judgment.UPDATE IV, MARCH 9, 3:35PM:
...Newsroom staffers should be receptive to complaints about inaccuracies and follow up on them.
Today, reporter Ben Kaufman, who writes the media column for Cincinnati CityBeat blogged about all this and included the photo of the protester's sign with a transcription of the definition of "santorum." Kaufman's a retired Enquirer reporter turned journalism professor.